Secure Automation Reviews
Automations accumulate access. A workflow built for one job ends up holding an admin token, piping customer records to a third-party API nobody documented, and logging nothing useful when it misfires. Our founding team comes from vulnerability assessment and penetration testing and digital forensics, so this is the review we would want run against our own builds.
- Credential scoping
- Data-flow mapping
- Prompt-injection testing
- Logging review
What gets built
Credential and access audit
Every token, scope, and service account a workflow holds, against what it actually needs.
Data-flow map
Where client and customer data travels, which third parties receive it, and what is retained where.
Prompt-injection testing
Adversarial inputs against assistants and document pipelines that act on untrusted content, with findings reproduced.
Logging and incident readiness
Whether you could reconstruct what a workflow did last Tuesday, and what to add so you can.
Built on
- n8n
- Cloud IAM
- Postgres
- OWASP LLM Top 10
Timeline
Typically 1 to 2 weeks for a review and written findings.